|
|||||
|
Reprinted with permission of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland and the Royal College of Anaesthetists THORACIC ANAESTHESIA UPDATE Dr Adrian Pearce, Thoracic surgery is undertaken in only 30-40 units
in the UK. National data is collected on number of cases and mortality.
Core operations are lobar resection, pneumonectomy for malignant and non-malignant
conditions, mediastinoscopy and mediastinotomy, bronchoscopy for diagnostic
and interventional reasons, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)
for drainage and investigation of effusions, management of air-leaks,
management of empyema and operations on the chest wall. Some surgeons
undertake both cardiac and thoracic surgery wilst others are dedicated
thoracic surgeons. Lung volume reduction surgery and lung transplantation
are specialised procedures usually rationalised to specific units or surgeons.
Oesophagectomy is now undertaken more commonly by 'general' surgeons.
Standard anaesthetic textbooks commonly contain a thoracic chapter. Rigid bronchoscopy may be for diagnostic or interventional procedures.
The latter include stenting, lasering and removal of foreign bodies. Propofol
by manual or target controlled infusion has revolutionised the provision
of anaesthesia particularly for longer procedures. Cardiovascular responses
are easily controlled by alfentanil or remifentanil which both permit
rapid awakening. Ventilation by the Sanders technique is still commonly
used. Suitable PVC tubes are 35, 37, 39, 41 Fr. One suggestion is (for left
DLT) to measure the tracheal width on the preop CXR since this predicts
the diameter of the left bronchus: > 18 mm 41 Fr, > 16 mm 39 Fr,
> 15 mm, 37 Fr and > 12 mm 35 Fr. This is specifically for Mallinckrodt
tubes and one study which tested this predictive sizing didn't prove (in
my view) it to be very useful. A lively debate continues 1, 2. A right tube may be more expensive, is harder to place so that the right upper lobe is patent, requires fibrescopic checking and may not be possible to place when airway anatomy is abnormal. Early work detailing problems with right tubes has now been followed by studies suggesting that a right DLT placed and checked by fibre-endoscopy has no increased risk of complications. The indications for a right-sided tube are:
A recent review article 3 collected data from the world literature. Between 1972 and 1998, only 33 reports were identified. Reports involved 32 patients with red rubber DLTs and 14 patients with PVC DLTs. This may well just reflect the differing usage of these types of tubes. Authors were contacted to try and ascribe a cause for the airway trauma. A carinal hook, tube-tip irregularities, asymmetric cuff inflation, initial overinflation of the cuff and nitrous oxide induced cuff overinflation were the most common lessons. The bronchus was the most frequent site of injury, followed by tracheal damage followed by tracheo-bronchial tears. Almost half the published reports with PVC DLTs involved Japanese patients. Good practice recommendations to avoid airway trauma are:
It is firmly established that the positioning of a DLT should be by visualisation
of chest movement, auscultation, fibreendoscopy4
and a suitable pressure/volume/flow profile. A standard intubating fibrescope
with nominal diameter 4mm will not pass down a 35 Fr and passes with difficulty
down a 37 Fr DLT. Generally these smaller tubes are used in females: This
gender discrimination should be overcome by purchasing a fibrescope designed
for checking DLT e.g the Olympus LF-DP with a diameter 3.1mm. The sequence
of checking is to pass the fibrescope down the tracheal limb to check
that the correct bronchus has been intubated and to make certain that
it is the correct depth. The bronchial limb of a right tube should always
be checked to make certain that the slit in the bronchial cuff is opposite
the right upper lobe bronchus. The right upper lobe has no constant anatomy
and one should at least consider the desirability of inspecting the airway
fibreoptically to make certain that the anatomy will suit a DLT. This
can be done by passing the DLT through the vocal cords but not advancing
beyond midtrachea. The fibrescope is placed through the bronchial limb
and is advanced to inspect the anatomy and to guide the tube into position. Bronchial blockers are making a comeback particulary in the US (see Univent Tube on www.vitaidltd.com/Univent.htm or Arndt Endobronchial blocker set on www.cookgroup.com/cook_critical_care/blocker.html). A blocker is effectively a balloon on a suction catheter and is placed under direct or fibreoptic vision into the bronchus. The trachea is intubated with a normal single lumen tube and the blocker may pass within or outside the tracheal tube. When the blocker is inflated, that lung will not be ventilated. The 'suction catheter' element passing to the tip allows the isolated lung to deflate, or suctioning. A blocker might therefore be used instead of a DLT in a normal patient, be used when it would be difficult to insert a DLT (difficult intubation or paediatric) or when the airway anatomy is not suitable for a DLT. A blocker may also allow continued inflation of one lobe of the operated lung, for example if placed in the right bronchus intermedius, will allow right upper lobe ventilation when the operation is on the lower lobe. An editorial5 this year describes the characteristics of the ideal blocker;
Tips in the same editorial for insertion of a blocker are:
One study6 compared left DLT with left
and right bronchial blockers. Left blockers took longer to place but both
left DLT and left blocker were satisfactory. Satisfactory lung deflation
was obtained in only half of the right blocker cases. Physiology of one lung ventilation (OLV) Thoracic surgery is undertaken in the lateral position and the terms
non-dependent and dependent lung indicate the operative collapsed lung,
and continuously ventilated normal lung respectively. Clinically it is
possible to identify four different periods of ventilation - TLV supine;
TLV lateral, chest closed; TLV lateral, chest open and OLV. Classic teaching
is that in TLV-lateral the dependent lung receives about 60% of the blood
flow for gravitational reasons but only 40% of the total ventilation.
When OLV is instituted all ventilation goes to the dependent lung and
the non-dependent lung blood-flow (40% total) is reduced by 50% through
mechanisms including hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. This means that
20% blood flow still passes through the collapsed lung. Management of hypoxaemia during OLV
Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction9 HPV was first described in 1946 by Von Euler and Liljestrand who found
that when cats breathed an FIO2
of 0.105 the pulmonary artery pressure increased. Sympathetic or parasympathetic
blockade did not affect this response, and one physiological explanation
is that it derives from a direct effect of oxygen on pulmonary arterioles.
HPV response is a function of both alveolar and mixed venous oxygen
tensions and experimental elevation of mixed venous PO2
above 13 kPa abolishes the process. When the lung is collapsed during
OLV it is suggested that HPV decreases the blood flow to that lung by
50%. Effect of anaesthetic agents on HPV Early animal work demonstrated a marked (clinically relevant) inhibition
of HPV by inhalational but not intravenous agents. It sounds credible
that anaesthetic agents with a vasodilatory property would antagonise
a physiological process involving vasoconstriction. However, current work
supports at worst only a very modest (clinically borderline) impairment
of HPV by modern inhalational agents. This revision has been supported
by various criticisms of previous work. An agent may impair the effects
of alveolar hypoxia but any reduction in cardiac ouput would reduce mixed
venous oxygen and promote HPV. A recent paper10
examines the effects of increasing isoflurane or desflurane on various
parameters during OLV in intact pigs and is worth reading to understand
the difficulties of interpreting data. In humans, general anaesthesia
with isoflurane is associated with a higher shunt fraction than propofol
during OLV, but the prevalence of hypoxemia is similar. Recently11
no difference in shunt fraction between sevoflurane and propofol could
be demonstrated in humans during OLV. Modification of pulmonary blood flow during OLV Two approaches are to reduce PVR in the dependent lung or increase PVR in both (or a combination). Inhaled nitric oxide is a potent, short acting pulmonary vasodilator which is supplied only to the dependent ventilated lung during OLV and to regions of high ventilation within that lung. It has been studied in several studies and interestingly has little effect on oxygenation except perhaps in those patients with a low PaO2 pre NO treatment. A specimen paper12 investigated the effects of 40 ppm NO on 30 patients undergoing OLV in the standard lateral position. Mean shunt fraction increased from 14% during TLV to 42% with OLV but was not affected further by NO. Mean PaO2/FIO2 (mm Hg) values decreased from 420 on TLV to 170 on one lung but did not change with NO. In patients with a shunt fraction > 45% on OLV, PaO2/FIO2 value increased from 84 to 104 with NO. Nitric oxide is a toxic agent and alternatives13 are being investigated. In humans14 almitrine, an intravenously
administered pulmonary vasoconstrictor available in France, prevents or
limits OLV induced decreases in PaO2
(this effect had previously been documented in a dog model). In patients
anaesthetised with propofol/sufentanil and ventilated with 100% oxygen,
an almitrine infusion at 8mcg/kg/min was started at initiation of OLV.
With placebo the arterial oxygen tension fell from 430 to 178mmHg over
30 minutes, but with almitrine it fell only to 325mmHg. No changes in
CO or PVR were seen with this dose of almitrine. Pain relief following thoracotomy A good editorial15 a year ago considered
the topical issues. There is as much debate16,17
about the use or need for epidural analgesia as in other areas of major
surgery. One particular local technique with a good record is paravertebral
block insituted either by the anaesthetist percutaneously (see www.nysora.com
for technique) or most easily with the catheter placed by the surgeon
at the end of surgery. We have used this latter technique at Guy's/St
Thomas' for many years, infusing lignocaine 0.5% at 10ml/hr continuously
for 48hr on the ward. It is supplemented by NSAID and PCA morphine. Advocates18
suggest that paravertebral blockade may be more effective with a lower
complication rate than epidural. Post lung resection morbidity/mortality About 15% - 40% patients develop an arrhythmia which is usually atrial fibrillation, (usually) on the second or third postoperative day. This is more common in older patients19and is associated with a longer hospital stay and increased mortality. Various papers have suggested that other factors associated with the development of AF are ischaemic changes on the ECG, cardiac enlargement, abnormal preoperative exercise test, intraoperative hypotension, postoperative pulmonary oedema, right sided operation and pneumonectomy. It may be indicative of poor cardiovascular reserve. Avenues of research are whether this represents sympathetic stimulation or raised pulmonary artery pressures. Relative sympathetic stimulation may result from intraoperative damage to parasympathetic pathways. A study20 comparing the effect of bupivacaine with morphine thoracic epidural analgesia on the prevalence of arrythmias in 50 patients showed that bupivacaine was associated with a lower incidence and duration of arrythmia than morphine. Postoperative administration of oxygen21 to the third postoperative day did not affect the incidence of AF. The overall mortality rate after pneumonectomy is 7-12% in large22 or national studies. The causes being pneumonia, sepsis, cardiac causes, DVT/PE etc. A specific problem is post-resection pulmonary oedema. This is more common, and more serious, after pneumonectomy (2-4%) than lobectomy. Criteria are the combination of clinical respiratory distress and hypoxaemia, with diffuse shadowing on CXR in the absence of cardiac dysfunction, pneumonia, sepsis or aspiration. Slinger provides a thoughtful review23 of the condition and lists what is 'known':
Alvarez24 describes the onset and management of the condition in 5 patients. It is clear that overzealous fluid administration is not the cause but may exacerbate the condition. It appears to be due to capillary endothelial leak. Are steroids of use? Data from the management of ARDS patients suggests that volutrauma may
be an important adverse factor. Perhaps OLV should be pressure rather
than volume controlled. Internet resources and thoracic anaesthesia An article25 lists many sites. A starting point is the 'related sites' link at the Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anaesthesia on www.jcardioanesthia.com adrian.pearce@gstt.sthames.nhs.uk
|
|||||
|
|