|
CAUDAL EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA FOR PEDIATRIC PATIENTS:
A SAFE, RELIABLE AND EFFECTIVE METHOD IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
Alice Edler MD, MA (Education),
Assistant Professor of Clinical Anesthesiology,
Vinit G.Wellis, MD,
Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology,
Department of Anesthesiology,
Section of Pediatric Anesthesiology,
Stanford University School of Medicine,
3300 Pasteur Dr.,
Rm. H3580,
Stanford Ca. 94305 USA
Introduction
In all areas of anesthesia, safety and efficiency are valued goals,and
in developing countries additional challenges due to shortages of anesthetic
drugs, supplies and monitoring equipment may be present. Caudal epidural
anesthesia in developing countries, can in combination with general anesthesia
or alone provide safe, reliable and efficient analgesia and / or anesthesia
for both high risk and general pediatric surgical patients.
These techniques can be easily learnt and may be modified to extend analgesia
into the postoperative period (with the addition of opioids or continuous
techniques) or replace general anesthesia in circumstances where either
the equipment or general anesthetic techniques are not available. The
following manuscript will describe the pharmacological and physiologic
basis of caudal epidural anesthesia, techniques for administration, monitoring,
and specific modifying techniques of caudal epidural anesthesia and a
discussion of complications and contraindications to caudal epidural anesthesia
in pediatric patients.
top
History
Although spinal anesthesia was used in pediatric anesthesia as early
as the 1940's, reports of successful pediatric caudal epidural anesthetics
initially came from developing countries and in 1967, Fortuna reported
a series of 170 patients between the ages of 1- 10 years who received
caudal epidural anesthesia for surgical procedures of the lower abdomen
and lower extremities. These results showed that caudal anesthesia either
alone or in combination with general anesthesia was well tolerated with
little in the way of respiratory depression or cardiovascular changes.
A further series from Zimbabwe reported 500 pediatric caudal epidural
anesthetics. The reported success rate was high (close to 90%), again
being well tolerated by the patients, with little in the way of respiratory
or cardiovascular problems, but with major failures due to incomplete
block or restlessness during surgery. As these patients were only sedated,
not anesthetized this could have accounted for some of the technical difficulties
in positioning the caudal epidural needle and the restlessness during
the surgery.
Today pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia is a well-accepted technique
commonly used in combination with general anesthesia or occasionally as
the sole anesthetic in high-risk patients.
top
Indications
Caudal epidural anesthesia in children can be used in:
- Lower abdominal surgery: (incision below the umbilicusT10
sensory level) especially perineal, genitourinary or ilioinginual surgery.
- Lower extremity surgery (hip, leg and foot): though at times
it is difficult to achieve a satisfactory block to the distal 1/3 of
the foot.
- Newborn and premature infants: If used as the sole anesthetic,
caudal epidural anesthesia reduces the risk of respiratory depression
from residual neuromuscular blockade (pancuronium) and inhalation anesthetics.
Post-operative apnea associated with general anesthesia, is reduced
with caudal anesthesia but not abolished.
- Neuromuscular disease such as muscular dystrophy. There is
a high incidence of postoperative respiratory failure due to a combination
of general anesthesia and muscle weakness. Caudal epidural anesthesia
indicated for lower extremity surgery (very common in these patients).
- Malignant hyperthermia: it is generally accepted that all
local anesthetic agents are considered safe.
| Table 1: Formulas to calculate drug
volumes (mls) for single shot caudal epidural block (see also table
3) |
| Local Anesthetic* |
Dose (mls) |
Estimated Sensory Level |
| 1 % Lignocaine |
0.06ml/segment |
Mid-Thoracic (T8) |
| 0.25% Bupivicaine |
1ml/kg |
Mid-Thoracic (T8) |
| 0.175% Bupivicaine |
1.25 ml/kg |
Mid Thoracic (T8) |
| * All solutions are containing epinephrine 1:200,000 |
top
Contraindications
The contraindications for caudal epidural anesthesia are similar to those
for spinal or lumbar epidural anesthesia.
- Coagulation disorders: Bleeding abnormalities are an absolute
contraindication to caudal epidural anesthesia. These abnormalities
can be due to disorders of coagulation factor activity (such as Hemophilia,
ITP, tumors, or DIC from sepsis) or from the administration of anticoagulants
such as heparin or Warfarin. If there are any questions about the coagulation
status, the anesthetist should perform a bleeding time test and confirm
that the bleeding time is normal. Bleeding time is a simple laboratory
procedure that can be done at the bedside and gives results within 5
minutes. Another laboratory test to consider is INR. This is a more
sophisticated test and may not be available at all hospitals.
- Infection: Caudal epidural anesthesia should not be used if
there is an active infection at the site of injection either at the
skin surface or below. This includes active cellulitis, pilonidal/ perirectal
abscess, and meningitis. Even in the absence of localized infection,
the caudal region has a higher bacterial count than the lumbar epidural
space.
- Unstable blood pressure and/or heart rate
- Patient or parent refusal
- Congenital anatomic anomalies of the spinal cord or vertebral bodies
- in cases of Spina Bifida, caudal epidural anesthesia should not be
attempted as the spinal cord may be tethered within the spinal canal.
- Scoliosis is not an absolute contraindication to caudal epidural
anesthesia though scolisis may make caudal epidural anesthesia technically
more difficult to achieve.
- The dose of bupivicaine must be carefully controlled in patients
with decreased cardiac function, as is often the case of patients with
muscular dystrophy.
| Table 2 Maximum Recommended Doses
of Local Anesthetics for Regional Anesthesia |
| Drug |
Mg/kg (with epinephrine) |
Duration (minutes) |
| Lignocaine |
4 (7) |
45 -180 |
| Bupivicaine |
2 (3) |
180-600 |
| Tetracaine |
1.5 |
180-600 |
| 2 Chloroprocaine |
8 (10) |
30-60 |
| Procaine |
8 (10) |
60-90 |
top
Anatomy and technique of caudal
anaesthesia
The sacral hiatus (SH) in an infant or young child is easily identified
because the landmarks are more superficial. The sacral hiatus is formed
by failure of fusion of the fifth sacral vertebral arch. The remnants
of the arch are known as the sacral cornu, and are located on either side
of the hiatus. (See figure 1) The coccyx lies caudal
to/lower than the sacral hiatus. Drawing an equilateral triangle by connecting
the two posterior superior iliac spines (PSIS) usually locates the sacral
hiatus at the apex. Palpation of the sacral hiatus at the apex of this
inverted triangle should identify the puncture site. Alternatively, the
anesthetist can palpate the convexity of the coccyx and then move cephalad
to palpate the concave sacral hiatus to identify the puncture site. (See
figure 2).
|

Figure 1: Positioning and Anatomy of Sacral Hiatus
|
|

Figure 2: Anatomic Representation of Caudal Epidural
Space
|
In young children, the epidural space can be easily reached by the caudal
epidural approach with less risk of dural puncture than with thoracic
or lumbar epidural approaches. There is minimal risk of cord injury at
the level of the sacrococcygeal ligament so general anesthesia or heavy
sedation is not often required to prevent the child from moving. However,
the dural sac can extend to the level of third or fourth sacral vertebrae
in the newborn and therefore care must be taken to avoid an inadvertent
intrathecal injection. The sacrococcygeal ligament binds the sacral hiatus
posteriorly, superiorly by the sacral cornu and the fused arch of the
sacrum. There is considerable variation in the anatomy of the sacral hiatus,
which may account for the small percentage of caudal epidural block failures.
In addition, there is considerable variation in the angle of the sacral
canal. Adult patients of African descent, have a steeper angle of entry
into the sacral canal, therefore making the angle of initial needle place
different than non-African women. (See figures 4 and
5).

Figure.3: Syringe and Needle attachment for Caudal
Epidural
top
Technique
Caudal epidural block can be performed in the prone or lateral decubitus
position. The first step is to identify the sacral hiatus. It is essential
that the skin over the caudal area is cleaned with an iodine or alcohol
(70%) containing solution, which is allowed to dry. Then, using sterile
technique, the caudal epidural space is entered using a short 23-gauge
needle or a 22-gauge IV catheter. (See figure 3). The
needle is inserted at a 60-degree angle and the needle is advanced until
a "pop" is felt. (See figure 4) The needle
is then lowered to a 20-degree angle and advanced an additional 2-3 mm
to make sure the bevel is in the caudal epidural space, (See figure
5) if using a cannula withdraw the stylet and advance the cannula
into the caudal space. Do not advance the needle or cannula any more than
is necessary.
|

Figure 4: Initial Insertion
|
|

Figure 5 Repositioning and Completion of Epidural
Injection
|
Advancement of the cannula rather than the needle may reduce the incidence
of inadvertent dural or vascular puncture and easy progression of the
cannula is a good prognostic sign of success. Test aspiration should be
gentle as vessel walls can easily collapse producing a false negative.
If no blood or CSF is aspirated then the appropriate amount of local anesthetic
is injected in small amounts, with repeated aspirations throughout the
injection. An epinephrine containing test dose can be used to exclude
intravascular injection. The most important test for correct placement
(not including intravascular placement) is ease of injection. If the local
anesthetic solution can be injected with little resistance, it is mostly
likely in the correct space. If there is initial resistance or resistance
develops over the course of the injection, the injection should be stopped
and the needle location reassessed. There will be some increase in resistance
as the potential space of the caudal epidural space is expanded, but this
should be minimal.
If the hands are positioned as seen in figure 4, subcutaneous
bulging, indicating subcutaneous injection will be detected by the thumb.
Injection of air to confirm identification of the caudal space should
be avoided because of the risk of air embolus. If the angle of insertion
is too shallow, the needle may go subcutaneously. This produces an incomplete
block and can cause pressure necrosis if large volumes of solution, especially
epinephrine-containing solutions, are injected subcutaneously. If the
angle of insertion is too steep, the needle may actually penetrate the
vertebral bodies resulting in intraosseous injection and possible osteomyelitis.
'Single shot' technique: Caudal epidural anesthesia can be used
as a "single shot" technique providing anesthesia limited by
the duration of the local anesthetic that is chosen. This "single
shot " may be repeated at the end of the surgery to prolong the analgesic
effect into the postoperative period. Single shot caudal epidural anesthesia
has a reported high success rate, frequently over 90%.
'Continuous / catheter' technique: an indwelling catheter can
be placed to provide anesthesia of longer duration than single dose of
local anesthesia would allow. Another advantage of an indwelling caudal
epidural catheter is the ability to thread the catheter to a higher location
in the epidural space and therefore achieve a higher, more localized block
with less local anesthesia dose. Because of the close proximity of the
perineum and likelihood of infection, a caudal catheter should not be
left in situ ideally for longer than 36 - 48hrs.
top
Monitoring
Monitoring for caudal epidural anesthesia must include monitoring of
ventilation, oxygenation, and circulation at least every 3 minutes. These
can be accomplished with automated equipment such as automated blood pressure
monitor, ECG, pulse oximeter, and capnograph. If automated monitoring
equipment is not available, vital signs can be just as well be monitored
with a sphygmomanometer, pericardial stethoscope and a finger on the temporal
pulse. A means of temperature monitoring, such as an axillary thermometer
is also needed if the anesthetist expects changes in body temperate due
to loss of heat from surgery or cold operating theaters.
top
Local anaesthetic drugs and additives
Local anesthetics can be divided into two classes of compounds, Amides
and Esters. The amides undergo metabolism by the liver, and the esters
are hydrolyzed primarily in the plasma by cholinesterase. These different
routes of metabolism are important in pediatric patients who may have
immature liver function, especially neonates. Neonates have lower levels
of alpha1 acid glycoprotein and albumin, 60% and 30% respectively compared
to adults. This causes a reduction in the binding of protein bound drugs,
such as amide local anesthetics, increasing the free (unbound fraction)
thus increasing the possibility of toxic effects (max dose bupivacaine
in neonate 1.5mg/kg). The volume of distribution of local anesthetics
is larger in children than adults, which results in lower peak plasma
levels, but this is counteracted by the reduction in the rate of elimination
of local anesthetics in children.
| Table 3. Armitage (1989) 0.25% Bupivacaine
- Bupivacaine 0.19% for volume in excess of 20mls (one part 0.9% sodium
chloride + three parts 0.25% Bupivacaine) |
| Segmental level of operation |
Dose ml/kg |
| Lumbo-sacral |
0.5 |
| Thoraco-lumbar |
1.0 |
| Mid-Thoracic |
1.25 |
The maximum recommended doses of local anesthetics in children older
than 4 weeks (doses should be reduced in neonates), are lidocaine 3mg/kg,
(6mg/kg with adrenaline), bupivacaine 2- 2.5mg/kg (addition of adrenaline
will delay peak plasma level but will not extend duration). Note:
malnutrition may also decrease albumin concentration causing reduced protein
binding and increased free (unbound fraction) drug - increasing toxic
effects.
The spread of local anesthetic injected into the caudal epidural space
in children less than 7yrs of age is predictable and correlates well with
age and weight encouraging the use of formulae or normograms.
- Bupivacaine: provides reliable, long-lasting anesthesia and
postoperative analgesia. An easy rule is 1ml/kg of Bupivacaine 0.25%
with epinephrine 1:200,000 provides 3-6 hours of anesthesia for all
procedures below the umbilicus. In Infants, less than 2.5 kg a more
dilute solution is used (0.125% / 0.19 %) and the volume can be increased
to remain below the toxic dose range. See tables 1,
2 and 3.
- Adrenaline (epinephrine) 1:200,000: combined with the local
anesthetic solution can be used as a test dose. If the injection mistakenly
occurs into a blood vessel, either vein or artery, the heart rate should
increase more than 10 beats in 10 seconds after injection when epinephrine
is added. However, this test dose is not 100% conclusive of intravenous
injection.
- Opioids prolong analgesia in infants and children. Epidural
opioids should be reserved for surgery in which catheterization is required
and all children should be admitted to an area of the hospital where
close monitoring and observation will take place. A dose of 50mcg/kg
of preservative free morphine or diamorphine 30mcg/kg can be added to
the local anesthetic solution. This will provide 12 to 24 hours of analgesia
but can produce urinary retention, nausea, and itching and respiratory
depression. However, a dose of 33microgramg/kg of preservative free
morphine in the caudal epidural solution can provide prolonged analgesia,
with less risk of delayed respiratory depression.
- Clonidine: (a2-adrenergic agonist,
with spinal analgesic action). A dose of 0.5-1.0 microgram/kg improves
the quality and duration of analgesia with bupivacaine without causing
significant bradycardia or respiratory depression, lasting for up to
12 hours. Doses greater than 1 microgram/kg are often associated with
increased sedation.
- Ketamine: an NMDA antagonist. In doses of 0.25 - 1.0 mg/ kg,
causes significant prolongation of postoperative analgesia, when compared
to 0.25 % bupivacaine alone . There is no increase in adverse effects
including delayed motor strength, time to micturation, postoperative
sedation or postoperative nausea and vomiting. Though in doses higher
than 0.5 mg/kg, the neuroleptic effects of ketamine appear to be more
of a problem. Preservative free ketamine should be used at all times
if possible, although animal studies have been performed using ketamine
with benzothonium chloride demonstrating no histologic or pathologic
changes in the spinal cord or roots but these have not been confirmed
in human subjects.
top
Complications
The complications for caudal epidural anesthesia can be classified as:
- Failed or incomplete block. Between 5- 25 % of caudal epidural
blocks can be considered "failed or incomplete", this includes
a number of different problems.
The anesthetist may not be able to identify the anatomic landmarks and
are therefore unable to insert the caudal needle into the epidural space.
This occurs frequently in small children with anomalies of those structures
originating from the urogential ridge such as hypospadias, imperforate
anus or chloacal atresia. In some of these children, it is impossible
to palpate the sacral hiatus.
Also as the child advances in age the sacral plate tends to flatten
out, making the insertion of the needle through the sacrococcygeal ligament
more difficult. By far the easiest insertion is in the child below the
age of 7 years. Though caudal anesthesia can and is accomplished in
the older patient, it is technically more difficult.
- Unilateral block: less common than with lumbar epidural because
the sacral/ caudal epidural space is bigger and requires more volume
to fill. Patchy and one-sided blocks are rare with caudal epidural anesthesia
but can result from too rapid injection of local anesthesia dose. Local
anesthetics should be injected slowly over 2 minutes after test dose.
It is not infrequent though to have too low a block. This is a result
of insufficient local anesthetic volume. Remember that the volume of
the dose is often limited by total mg/kg dose of the local anesthetic
that is chosen and must remain less than the toxic dose for that drug.
(See table 2.) One solution to this problem is to
give a more dilute solution. Decreasing the concentration allows the
anesthetists to give a larger volume of local anesthetic, though it
may decrease the intensity and duration of the block.
In my practice, I limit caudal epidural anesthesia to children who are
still small enough for their mothers to carry. In this way, if the child
is released from the hospital and still has some motor weakness of the
lower extremities, the parent can carry the child and I am less fearful
that the child will fall and injure himself.
- Local anesthetic toxicity
Intravascular injection: Even though most local anesthetics have
close to 100% bio-availability from the epidural space, they are absorbed
over time. Intravascular injection allows immediate bioavailability
of the total dose of the local anesthetic with consequent systemic toxicity
if the peak plasma concentrations are with the toxic range. Peak concentration
is lower if drugs are injected slowly. As the extradural veins have
no valves, local anesthetic can enter the cerebral circulation by retrograde
flow, producing convulsion at doses lower than recommended maximum safe
doses. If large volumes of local anesthetic are given (>10mls) the
anesthetist should aspirate again in the middle of the injection as
the expansion of the potential epidural space can displace the tip of
the needle. The anesthetist should be aware of potential intravascular
injection throughout the injection.
Absorption / overdose: If either incorrect dosing or volume is
injected then absorption of the local anesthetic will result in a rise
in plasma level over time into the toxic range (not immediately as with
intravascular injection). It is important to strictly follow the guidelines
of local anesthetic dose given in table 2.
- Dural puncture (intrathecal injection). The spinal cord typically
ends at the first lumbar vertebra in the adult but can be as low as
the third or fourth lumbar vertebra in the neonate and premature infant,
with the corresponding dural sac extending 1- 2 vertebral segments below
this. There is considerable variation in the level of termination of
the spinal cord. If unintentional dural puncture is performed, a large
dose of local anesthetic is injected intrathecally. This will produce
a 'total spinal block', characterized by sudden apnea, unconsciousness
and dilated pupils. There is usually little in the way of haemodynamic
disturbance in young children and babies.
- Intraosseous injection. An intraosseous injection is equivalent
to an intravenous injection.
- Penetration of the sacrum. In infants and young babies, the
vertebral bodies can be soft due to incomplete calcification and the
anesthetist can pass the needle into the body of the sacrum and through
the vertebral body into the pelvis damaging either pelvic viscera or
aorta.
- Bleeding and infection: haematoma and abscess formation are
very uncommon after caudal epidural anesthesia but can result in serious
and permanent neurologic damage involving the spinal cord or cauda equina.
top
Conclusions
Caudal epidural anesthesia is a safe and effective method of anesthesia
in pediatric patients. It can be used as the sole anesthetic agent or
combined with general anesthesia to reduce both intraoperative anesthetic
requirement and postoperative need for additional analgesia. The addition
of opioids, clonidine or ketamine can significantly enhance and prolong
the anesthetic effects, even when used in minimal amounts and can reduce
the need for postoperative narcotics in some of the sickest and smallest
of children. However, as with all regional anesthetic techniques, extreme
diligence should be taken to insure sterility and avoid intravascular
injection or toxicity due to overdose of local anesthetic solutions.
top
Further Reading
- Update in Anaesthesia 1998 No. 8
top
|