 |
|
![[Next Article]](../graphics/nextart.gif) ![[Issue Index]](../graphics/blk_issu.gif) ![[Home Page]](../graphics/blk_home.gif) ![[Previous Article]](../graphics/prevart.gif)
| Issue 14 (2002) Article 5: Page 1 of 1 |
|
|
ASA AND CEPOD SCORING
Dr Richard Walker, Ashburton, UK
Several scoring systems have been devised to describe patients scheduled
for surgery and anaesthesia, the best known are the ASA and the CEPOD
scores.
The American Association of Anaesthetists (ASA) score subjectively categorises
patients into five subgroups by preoperative physical fitness. It was
devised in 1941 by the ASA as a statistical tool for retrospective analysis
of hospital records. Since inception it has been revised on several occasions
and now also includes an “E” suffix denoting an emergency case.[1]
ASA classification makes no adjustment for age, sex, weight, or for pregnancy,
nor does it reflect the nature of the planned surgery, the skill of the
anaesthetist or surgeon, the degree of pre-theatre preparation or facilities
for postoperative care. The ASA score does not give a prediction of risk
for a particular patient or operation. Since underlying fitness is an
important predictor of survival from surgery, the ASA score has some correlation
with outcome. As it is simple and widely understood, it is commonly used
as a part of the preoperative assessment, and is an easy tool for audit.
In the UK patients are coded according to their ASA and CEPOD scores.
These describe the patient from the perspectives of basic risk banding
and urgency of surgery. The scores allow anaesthetists and surgeons to
describe their workload which may be helpful for audit purposes. Research
into perioperative outcome use these scores widely as descriptors of the
surgical population.![[Top]](../graphics/top_bult.gif)
References
1. Anon. New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 1963;24:111
2. Buck N, Devlin HB, Lunn JN. The report of a confidential enquiry into
perioperative deaths. The Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust and Kings
Fund, London (1987)
| Table 1. ASA Scores. |
|
Class
|
Physical status |
Example |
I
|
A completely healthy patient |
A fit patient with an inguinal hernia |
| II |
A patient with mild systemic disease |
Essential hypertension, mild diabetes without end
organ damage |
| III |
A patient with severe systemic disease
that is not incapacitating |
Angina, moderate to severe COPD |
| IV |
A patient with incapacitating disease that
is a constant threat to life |
Advanced COPD, cardiac failure |
| V |
A moribund patient who is not expected
to live 24 hours with or without surgery |
Ruptured aortic aneurysm, massive pulmonary
embolism |
| E |
Emergency case |
|
![[Top]](../graphics/top_bult.gif)
| Table 2. CEPOD Scores |
|
Grade 1
|
Elective
Operation at time to suit both surgeon and patient |
| Grade 2 |
Scheduled
Operation within 24 hours. Delayed operation after resuscitation |
| Grade 3 |
Urgent
Operation between 1 and 3 weeks. Early surgery preferred, but not
life saving |
| Grade 4 |
Emergency
Operation within 1 hour. Immediate operation or resuscitation simultaneous
with surgical treatment |
![[Top]](../graphics/top_bult.gif)
|
|